{"id":37,"date":"2010-03-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.hostingsystems.co.uk\/uk\/blog\/2010\/03\/04\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/"},"modified":"2024-08-21T17:02:20","modified_gmt":"2024-08-21T16:02:20","slug":"court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/","title":{"rendered":"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors&#8217; retainers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Court of Appeal has overturned the decisions of two lower courts, in ruling that a firm of solicitors was entitled to terminate their retainer with a client who had insisted that they advance &#8220;unarguable&#8221; points of law before the Court.<\/p>\n<p>In reaching its decision in the case of Buxton v Mills-Owen [2008] EWHC 1831 (QB), the Court of Appeal took into account the fact that, pursuant to CPR 1.1, the overriding objective would not be furthered by litigants advancing hopeless arguments.<\/p>\n<p>The Court also held that the appellant solicitors were entitled to be paid all fees incurred up to the date on which they had terminated their client&#8217;s retainer.<\/p>\n<p>A complete version of the judgment can be viewed at the following link: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bailii.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Civ\/2010\/122.html\">http:\/\/www.bailii.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Civ\/2010\/122.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Court of Appeal has overturned the decisions of two lower courts, in ruling that a firm of solicitors was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[13,14,15],"class_list":["post-37","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-case-law","tag-client-care","tag-retainers","tag-solicitors"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Court of Appeal decision on solicitors&#039; retainers - Fenchurch Law UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors&#039; retainers - Fenchurch Law UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Court of Appeal has overturned the decisions of two lower courts, in ruling that a firm of solicitors was [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Fenchurch Law UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-04T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-21T16:02:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael Hayes\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael Hayes\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael Hayes\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0dc618622f4d437bfe590862d6078dd7\"},\"headline\":\"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors&#8217; retainers\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-04T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-21T16:02:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":137,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"client care\",\"retainers\",\"Solicitors\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/\",\"name\":\"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors' retainers - Fenchurch Law UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-04T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-21T16:02:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0dc618622f4d437bfe590862d6078dd7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors&#8217; retainers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Fenchurch Law UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0dc618622f4d437bfe590862d6078dd7\",\"name\":\"Michael Hayes\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8f07043386f3d56c66ba89b0038e27b34a40fd7b5687dc1cca8f1e72b6c8faec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8f07043386f3d56c66ba89b0038e27b34a40fd7b5687dc1cca8f1e72b6c8faec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8f07043386f3d56c66ba89b0038e27b34a40fd7b5687dc1cca8f1e72b6c8faec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michael Hayes\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fenchurchlaw.com\\\/en-uk\\\/author\\\/michaelhayes\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors' retainers - Fenchurch Law UK","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors' retainers - Fenchurch Law UK","og_description":"The Court of Appeal has overturned the decisions of two lower courts, in ruling that a firm of solicitors was [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/","og_site_name":"Fenchurch Law UK","article_published_time":"2010-03-04T00:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-21T16:02:20+00:00","author":"Michael Hayes","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael Hayes","Estimated reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael Hayes","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/#\/schema\/person\/0dc618622f4d437bfe590862d6078dd7"},"headline":"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors&#8217; retainers","datePublished":"2010-03-04T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-21T16:02:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/"},"wordCount":137,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["client care","retainers","Solicitors"],"articleSection":["Case Law"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/","url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/","name":"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors' retainers - Fenchurch Law UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-04T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-21T16:02:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/#\/schema\/person\/0dc618622f4d437bfe590862d6078dd7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/court-of-appeal-decision-on-solicitors-retainers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court of Appeal decision on solicitors&#8217; retainers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/","name":"Fenchurch Law UK","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/#\/schema\/person\/0dc618622f4d437bfe590862d6078dd7","name":"Michael Hayes","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8f07043386f3d56c66ba89b0038e27b34a40fd7b5687dc1cca8f1e72b6c8faec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8f07043386f3d56c66ba89b0038e27b34a40fd7b5687dc1cca8f1e72b6c8faec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8f07043386f3d56c66ba89b0038e27b34a40fd7b5687dc1cca8f1e72b6c8faec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Michael Hayes"},"url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/author\/michaelhayes\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1210,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37\/revisions\/1210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}