{"id":344,"date":"2023-09-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-08-31T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.hostingsystems.co.uk\/sg\/blog\/2023\/09\/01\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/"},"modified":"2024-08-21T16:26:05","modified_gmt":"2024-08-21T15:26:05","slug":"insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/","title":{"rendered":"Insurance for fees claims: RSA &#038; Ors v Tughans"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><u>Introduction<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This Court of Appeal decision, in which our firm represented the successful respondents, considered the scope of a professional indemnity policy written on a full \u201ccivil liability\u201d basis.\u00a0 Will such a policy respond to a claim against a firm (in this case, a firm of Solicitors) for damages referable to its fee, for which the firm had performed the contractually agreed work, but where the fee was only paid by the client following a misrepresentation by the firm?<\/p>\n<p>That was the issue in <em><u>Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Limited &amp; Ors v Tughans (a firm<\/u><\/em>) [2023] EWCA Civ 999 (31 August 2023), although it is important to stress that the Court of Appeal hearing, like the Commercial Court before it, proceeded on the assumption that there had in fact been a misrepresentation.\u00a0 Whether that was or was not the case remains to be determined in the underlying proceedings against the Solicitors.<\/p>\n<p>The underling facts of the case were complex, but the appellant Insurers\u2019 argument was summarised by the Court of Appeal as follows:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cBecause the fee was procured by misrepresentation, Tughans had no right to retain it; and if it was obliged to return it, as part of a damages claim, it had not lost something to which as a matter of substance it was entitled, just as much as if the contract were avoided and it was obliged to return it or its value in a restitutionary claim\u2026\u00a0 Tughans had not suffered a loss in the amount of the fee, and cover for that element of a damages claim would violate the indemnity principle.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>That argument failed at first instance before Foxton J, and failed again in the Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>The indemnity principle<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>At the heart of Insurers\u2019 argument was reliance on the indemnity principle, the principle that a policy of indemnity insurance (as distinct from contingency insurance) will only indemnify an insured\u2019s actual loss, and no more than that.\u00a0 The Court of Appeal held that Insurers\u2019 reliance on the indemnity principle here was misplaced, for a number of reasons.<\/p>\n<p>First, a professional who has done the contractually agreed work, and has earned the contractually agreed fee, does suffer a loss if he is ordered to return the fee because the retainer had been procured by a misrepresentation.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, the Insurers\u2019 argument was inconsistent with the public interest in there being compulsory PI cover for certain professionals, so that, if a firm and its partners were not good for the money, a client would be unprotected where its damages claim included the fee which it had paid.<\/p>\n<p>Thirdly, the implication of the Insurers\u2019 argument would leave uninsured those partners, and potentially also those employees, who had no involvement with the misrepresentation and\/or who had not benefited in any way from the fee.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Restitutionary claims<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In <em>RSA v Tughans<\/em>, the underlying claim was one for damages, albeit damages calculated by reference to the fee which the client had paid.\u00a0 The Insurers argued that, since a claim framed in restitution would certainly not (they said) be covered, the same must be true of an analogous damages claim.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal was unpersuaded.\u00a0 First, a damages claim is different from a restitutionary one.\u00a0 In any case, the Court of Appeal held that not only would a professional indemnity policy cover a restitutionary claim in respect of a fee which had been earned, it might in some circumstances also cover a fee which had not been earned.\u00a0 Thus, said Popplewell LJ, if a professional <em>\u201c\u2026 receives money on account of fees, and an employee steals them from the client account, or negligently transfers them to a third party, before the work is done to earn the fee, a claim by the client for the money, advanced as a restitutionary claim, would seem to me to give rise to a liability which constitutes a loss; and would, moreover, appear to fall squarely within the intended scope of PII cover, and be a necessary part of cover if the PII policy is to fulfil the public protection function of a compulsory insurance scheme\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Conclusion<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is a very welcome decision for professional firms facing claims which extend to the fees which they have received and where previously PI insurers would have inevitably asserted that their policy would not cover such a claim.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fenchurchlaw.co.uk\/people\/jonathan-corman\/\">Jonathan Corman<\/a> is a partner at Fenchurch Law<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction This Court of Appeal decision, in which our firm represented the successful respondents, considered the scope of a professional [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":68,"featured_media":97,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[271],"class_list":["post-344","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-professional-risks"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Insurance for fees claims: RSA &amp; Ors v Tughans - Fenchurch Law APAC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Insurance for fees claims: RSA &amp; Ors v Tughans - Fenchurch Law APAC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Introduction This Court of Appeal decision, in which our firm represented the successful respondents, considered the scope of a professional [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Fenchurch Law APAC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-31T23:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-21T15:26:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"665\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jonathan Corman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jonathan Corman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jonathan Corman\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/135e435352cd2d347313c1046f07bfac\"},\"headline\":\"Insurance for fees claims: RSA &#038; Ors v Tughans\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-31T23:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-21T15:26:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/\"},\"wordCount\":733,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Professional Risks\"],\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/\",\"name\":\"Insurance for fees claims: RSA & Ors v Tughans - Fenchurch Law APAC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-31T23:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-21T15:26:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/135e435352cd2d347313c1046f07bfac\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":665,\"caption\":\"Fenchurch Law gavel\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Insurance for fees claims: RSA &#038; Ors v Tughans\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/\",\"name\":\"Fenchurch Law APAC\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/135e435352cd2d347313c1046f07bfac\",\"name\":\"Jonathan Corman\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c618ad96e4133aed6e2872019d6590ae06095495c660ffd629ca976c5ef8bbf4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c618ad96e4133aed6e2872019d6590ae06095495c660ffd629ca976c5ef8bbf4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c618ad96e4133aed6e2872019d6590ae06095495c660ffd629ca976c5ef8bbf4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jonathan Corman\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/author\/jonathancorman\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Insurance for fees claims: RSA & Ors v Tughans - Fenchurch Law APAC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Insurance for fees claims: RSA & Ors v Tughans - Fenchurch Law APAC","og_description":"Introduction This Court of Appeal decision, in which our firm represented the successful respondents, considered the scope of a professional [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/","og_site_name":"Fenchurch Law APAC","article_published_time":"2023-08-31T23:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-21T15:26:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":665,"url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jonathan Corman","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jonathan Corman","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/"},"author":{"name":"Jonathan Corman","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/135e435352cd2d347313c1046f07bfac"},"headline":"Insurance for fees claims: RSA &#038; Ors v Tughans","datePublished":"2023-08-31T23:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-21T15:26:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/"},"wordCount":733,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg","keywords":["Professional Risks"],"articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/","url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/","name":"Insurance for fees claims: RSA & Ors v Tughans - Fenchurch Law APAC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg","datePublished":"2023-08-31T23:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-21T15:26:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/135e435352cd2d347313c1046f07bfac"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2024\/08\/gavel.jpg","width":1000,"height":665,"caption":"Fenchurch Law gavel"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/insurance-for-claims-for-improperly-obtained-fees-rsa-ors-v-tughans\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Insurance for fees claims: RSA &#038; Ors v Tughans"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/","name":"Fenchurch Law APAC","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/135e435352cd2d347313c1046f07bfac","name":"Jonathan Corman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c618ad96e4133aed6e2872019d6590ae06095495c660ffd629ca976c5ef8bbf4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c618ad96e4133aed6e2872019d6590ae06095495c660ffd629ca976c5ef8bbf4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c618ad96e4133aed6e2872019d6590ae06095495c660ffd629ca976c5ef8bbf4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jonathan Corman"},"url":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/author\/jonathancorman\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/68"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":973,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344\/revisions\/973"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/97"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fenchurchlaw.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}